keryx: (march)
keryx ([personal profile] keryx) wrote2005-10-19 01:10 pm

extremists

Planned Parenthood sent me an email today about Harriet Miers' 'extremist views' being exposed, and it made me giggle, in a gallowsy way.

Was anyone really suprised [sure we're not happy about it, but were you really shocked?] to find out she's adamantly anti-abortion? I mean, hello - evangelical Christian! I'm sure there are evangelicals who are pro-choice, but it's not exactly the norm.

I'm a bit bothered by the disrespect that movements exhibit towards each other. Being strongly anti-abortion isn't any more extremist than my staunch pro-abortion position. Calling someone "extremist" is just a means of discrediting them, and it shouldn't be. Extremists make change happen; they're visionaries and activists if you agree with them, after all.

[identity profile] keryx.livejournal.com 2005-10-19 10:43 am (UTC)(link)
Did you hear the NPR report comparing the opinions of conservative non-activists to the conservative anti-abortion leaders in DC (on Miers, that is)?

Basically, DC folks who've been hoping to stack the court are upset that she's not going to be forceful enough in the short term to change things, not that she isn't ragingly conservative - she's just not experienced enough to be ragingly conservative in a way that really keeps the court from paying attention to the constitution & stuff. Something like that.