extremists
Oct. 19th, 2005 01:10 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Planned Parenthood sent me an email today about Harriet Miers' 'extremist views' being exposed, and it made me giggle, in a gallowsy way.
Was anyone really suprised [sure we're not happy about it, but were you really shocked?] to find out she's adamantly anti-abortion? I mean, hello - evangelical Christian! I'm sure there are evangelicals who are pro-choice, but it's not exactly the norm.
I'm a bit bothered by the disrespect that movements exhibit towards each other. Being strongly anti-abortion isn't any more extremist than my staunch pro-abortion position. Calling someone "extremist" is just a means of discrediting them, and it shouldn't be. Extremists make change happen; they're visionaries and activists if you agree with them, after all.
Was anyone really suprised [sure we're not happy about it, but were you really shocked?] to find out she's adamantly anti-abortion? I mean, hello - evangelical Christian! I'm sure there are evangelicals who are pro-choice, but it's not exactly the norm.
I'm a bit bothered by the disrespect that movements exhibit towards each other. Being strongly anti-abortion isn't any more extremist than my staunch pro-abortion position. Calling someone "extremist" is just a means of discrediting them, and it shouldn't be. Extremists make change happen; they're visionaries and activists if you agree with them, after all.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 10:23 am (UTC)hmm, I disagree. Favoring the illegalization of something that happens quite frequently across the US is a pretty extreme position, not at all comparable to favoring greater access to a legal procedure.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 10:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 10:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 10:59 am (UTC)We're smart people -- we can determine shades of gray. It isn't all black and white.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 10:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 10:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 10:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 10:32 am (UTC)Possibly not what you meant...
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 10:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 10:43 am (UTC)Basically, DC folks who've been hoping to stack the court are upset that she's not going to be forceful enough in the short term to change things, not that she isn't ragingly conservative - she's just not experienced enough to be ragingly conservative in a way that really keeps the court from paying attention to the constitution & stuff. Something like that.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 10:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 10:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 10:32 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 11:03 am (UTC)but then again, i get to see the faces of guilt and shame that these people put in my clients faces and i know what it's like to have to turn patients away because of the fucked up restrictions these "extremists" have made law.
and i personally think she sucks cause she's trying to take away my job! ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 11:58 am (UTC)word. this is the way i feel about the word radical, too.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 12:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 12:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 12:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 12:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 12:39 pm (UTC)Extremist, though, people use to mean "raging maniac", and I think that's disrespectful in the political domain.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 12:50 pm (UTC)I come down somewhere between Socialist and Radical, but I'll answer to either one.
I think extremist works in some cases, though I haven't worked out for myself whether Miers is one of those cases. I have no problem with the title being assigned to people who seek to implement an extreme position - like, no one should be allowed to have an abortion. I don't know if there's a comparable pro-choice position, since all we're doing is attempting to maintain a legal right that we've had for quite some time.
I guess it works for people who would advocate mandatory abortions/birth control/sterilization for poor women or teenage women, too. In that case, I would be using it as a descriptor to make damned sure no one confused me with them.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 01:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 01:07 pm (UTC)Someone who just thinks abortion is murder, and wants to legislate that - well, I think they're massively misguided, anti-woman & wrong, but their position isn't that extreme given the cultural context, I guess. It's conservative, but it's not way out in right field.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 12:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 01:09 pm (UTC)And of course, I feel the same about them.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-10-19 01:54 pm (UTC)as for extremism, i associate that term with static polarization and a kind of mental rigidity, one that doesn't permit self-examination and re-evaluation of one's position on an issue. refusal to think about the issue beyond a certain point. for me, it is different from commitment and it is negative.
for the other thing, the positive change-making thing you're talking about, i like the word radical. it conjures up those crazy unpaired electrons that go around getting involved in chemical reactions.
but that's just me, and i like your way of thinking about being extreme. :)
search engine optimization rankings backlink service
Date: 2011-09-26 09:16 pm (UTC)