extremists

Oct. 19th, 2005 01:10 pm
keryx: (march)
[personal profile] keryx
Planned Parenthood sent me an email today about Harriet Miers' 'extremist views' being exposed, and it made me giggle, in a gallowsy way.

Was anyone really suprised [sure we're not happy about it, but were you really shocked?] to find out she's adamantly anti-abortion? I mean, hello - evangelical Christian! I'm sure there are evangelicals who are pro-choice, but it's not exactly the norm.

I'm a bit bothered by the disrespect that movements exhibit towards each other. Being strongly anti-abortion isn't any more extremist than my staunch pro-abortion position. Calling someone "extremist" is just a means of discrediting them, and it shouldn't be. Extremists make change happen; they're visionaries and activists if you agree with them, after all.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 10:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peregrin8.livejournal.com
Being strongly anti-abortion isn't any more extremist than my staunch pro-abortion position.

hmm, I disagree. Favoring the illegalization of something that happens quite frequently across the US is a pretty extreme position, not at all comparable to favoring greater access to a legal procedure.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 10:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keryx.livejournal.com
I disagree with your disagreement. :) In the context of this culture, I think the on demand/without apology/no different from contraception stance is a pretty extreme position, or at least it's certainly greated as such by the not-staunchly-pro-choice people I talk to.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 10:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peregrin8.livejournal.com
But judicially, the pro-choice "extremists" have a lot more precedent on our side. How many abortions a year? And the legal fights tend to be about smaller subcategories of abortion. To ban it overall would be a pretty big shift. (I also think that "extremism" tends to have a more specific meaning when it's used in terms of judges, especially SCOTUS. We may have outside-the-mainstream views but we are not in a position to use them disruptively. Unfortunately!)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 10:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cutegaychick.livejournal.com
I think pro-life vs. pro-choice positions are only extremists if you take them to the extreme. Being staunchly anti-abortion isn't extremist -- shooting abortion doctors is. Believing that women should have control over the lives of their unborn children isn't extremist -- believing that they should have control over the lives of their already-born children is.

We're smart people -- we can determine shades of gray. It isn't all black and white.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 10:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keryx.livejournal.com
Also, what's going on with your jack o lantern's head/hair?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 10:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peregrin8.livejournal.com
It's broccoli. :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 10:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cutegaychick.livejournal.com
I think we should take her. The people we think of as extremists are calling her a liberal. If the conservatives don't like her, I think it could be a lot worse.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 10:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peregrin8.livejournal.com
I bet I could take her.

Possibly not what you meant...

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 10:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keryx.livejournal.com
I bet I could take her, too, although I doubt the administration would really set up a fair fight.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 10:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keryx.livejournal.com
Did you hear the NPR report comparing the opinions of conservative non-activists to the conservative anti-abortion leaders in DC (on Miers, that is)?

Basically, DC folks who've been hoping to stack the court are upset that she's not going to be forceful enough in the short term to change things, not that she isn't ragingly conservative - she's just not experienced enough to be ragingly conservative in a way that really keeps the court from paying attention to the constitution & stuff. Something like that.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 10:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] begraven.livejournal.com
I love the icon!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 10:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keryx.livejournal.com
Thank you!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 10:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] begraven.livejournal.com
Extremists are scary. They actually care enough about something to take a stand and do something *gasp*

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 11:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mellowtomysoul.livejournal.com
i agree that extremist's may be the wrong word. terrorists and murderers is much more appropriate. and honestly, i feel like anything that can discredit them is only a positive thing.

but then again, i get to see the faces of guilt and shame that these people put in my clients faces and i know what it's like to have to turn patients away because of the fucked up restrictions these "extremists" have made law.

and i personally think she sucks cause she's trying to take away my job! ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 11:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hope-persists.livejournal.com
Calling someone "extremist" is just a means of discrediting them, and it shouldn't be. Extremists make change happen; they're visionaries and activists if you agree with them, after all.

word. this is the way i feel about the word radical, too.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 12:24 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I'm on the fence about "extremist," but I love the word radical and embrace it, regardless of how my opponents may use it to discredit me. For instance, in the case of feminism, it describes an actual school of thought - it doesn't, contrary to the ravings of conservatives, mean merely that radical feminists are louder, hairier, or gayer than other feminists (though some of us are that, too, which is also great). It can't be used as an insult against me, because it's accurate. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 12:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fancymcsnazsnaz.livejournal.com
I have no idea how I managed to forget to log in just now.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 12:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hope-persists.livejournal.com
oh totally (on your anon comment). it is totall accurate. most of my problem is with our side using it to discredit the right wing. if it's something that we take and embrace and love to use to describe ourselves, than i don't like that we see that the same brand of fire is seen as so negative on the other side.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 12:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fancymcsnazsnaz.livejournal.com
I tend to just use "rabid" to describe the other side. ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 12:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keryx.livejournal.com
I HEART the word "radical". When people use it "against" me (meaning I'm "too involved", I guess), I embrace it - like HELL YEAH I'm radical (although in the sense of actually being a Radical Feminist, I'm not entirely).

Extremist, though, people use to mean "raging maniac", and I think that's disrespectful in the political domain.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 12:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fancymcsnazsnaz.livejournal.com
although in the sense of actually being a Radical Feminist, I'm not entirely

I come down somewhere between Socialist and Radical, but I'll answer to either one.

I think extremist works in some cases, though I haven't worked out for myself whether Miers is one of those cases. I have no problem with the title being assigned to people who seek to implement an extreme position - like, no one should be allowed to have an abortion. I don't know if there's a comparable pro-choice position, since all we're doing is attempting to maintain a legal right that we've had for quite some time.

I guess it works for people who would advocate mandatory abortions/birth control/sterilization for poor women or teenage women, too. In that case, I would be using it as a descriptor to make damned sure no one confused me with them.
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 01:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fancymcsnazsnaz.livejournal.com
There is a serious amount of LJ synergy happening today, and it's FREAKING ME OUT!

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 01:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keryx.livejournal.com
I think an anti-abortion extremist is anyone who does or advocates violence against the other side. Is there any equivalent to that on our side? I could see the forced-birth or hypothetical forced-abortion people as extremist, too - being confronted by an actual living person and making them do what you tell them by force is pretty extreme.

Someone who just thinks abortion is murder, and wants to legislate that - well, I think they're massively misguided, anti-woman & wrong, but their position isn't that extreme given the cultural context, I guess. It's conservative, but it's not way out in right field.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 12:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sonicage.livejournal.com
I disagree too. Not that it really matters. But I think the pro-life movement is extremist by definition because it seeks to completely outlaw abortion. There are very few in the pro-abortion movement that want to institute laws that force abortions on people. The majority of the pro-life movement explicitly wants to force people to have babies regardless of the circumstances.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 01:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keryx.livejournal.com
My disagreement stems from a desire to understand the other side, I guess (although as you mentioned, the word choice here is a niggling detail, doesn't matter that much) - from their perspective, anyone who wants to increase access to abortion is practicing murder or at least reckless disregard for life.

And of course, I feel the same about them.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-19 01:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] orkid.livejournal.com
re: miers. no. not a bit surprising.

as for extremism, i associate that term with static polarization and a kind of mental rigidity, one that doesn't permit self-examination and re-evaluation of one's position on an issue. refusal to think about the issue beyond a certain point. for me, it is different from commitment and it is negative.

for the other thing, the positive change-making thing you're talking about, i like the word radical. it conjures up those crazy unpaired electrons that go around getting involved in chemical reactions.

but that's just me, and i like your way of thinking about being extreme. :)
From: (Anonymous)
search engine optimization rankings seo optimization back link service (http://xrumerservice.org) backlinks checker

September 2020

S M T W T F S
  12345
678 9101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags