keryx: (polkadot)
[personal profile] keryx
One of the things my brilliant friend [livejournal.com profile] volondoinyaface said over this weekend was that we attach value to the size and shape of our body not just because of enculturation, but as a result of experience.

She was talking specifically about my thing with the shrinking - I associate weightloss with losing control or casting about, and also with incessant praise (and praise with intrusiveness), so there's logic to my fragmented response to this thing. I'm not just a puppet of social conditioning.

I think this is, in general, a better model for how size should exist in our minds. It's not that size should be utterly devoid of other significance, but that we should be free to associate size with experience just as one might do hair length or something. And that is the difference between size acceptance and a fat movement. In the latter, shifting size is almost automatically a problem, while the former leaves you room to attach any experience to size.

You know, in a glowing happy utopia. In the real world, fat is way too loaded to be purely about individual experience.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

September 2020

S M T W T F S
  12345
678 9101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags