is there a rulebook somewhere?
May. 6th, 2004 08:25 pmThe replying to comments on LJ confounds me sometimes. Some of the people I read seem to respond to every single comment, which seems really sweet and polite. But when I do that, I feel like I'm always trying to have the last word, whether I have a real response or not.
I think that comes from blogging (I had a blog or other less community-oriented journal online for ages before I succumbed to the LJ phenomenon). There are people who read my blog constantly and never ever comment. And some comment just to say "yay". I reply when it sparks something other than "yay back at ya", and that seems to be what most bloggers do. Replying to a blog comment, even on a threaded comment blog, usually means sending both an email and posting on your site.
What do you do? Do you answer every comment? Do you feel snubbed if your comments aren't answered by the LJ user you posted to? Are you miffed at me right now because I didn't answer a comment you posted on my LJ?
I think that comes from blogging (I had a blog or other less community-oriented journal online for ages before I succumbed to the LJ phenomenon). There are people who read my blog constantly and never ever comment. And some comment just to say "yay". I reply when it sparks something other than "yay back at ya", and that seems to be what most bloggers do. Replying to a blog comment, even on a threaded comment blog, usually means sending both an email and posting on your site.
What do you do? Do you answer every comment? Do you feel snubbed if your comments aren't answered by the LJ user you posted to? Are you miffed at me right now because I didn't answer a comment you posted on my LJ?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-07 07:25 am (UTC)Really, I don't see too many "yay"s as a bad thing, I think that's the crux of it. I do frequently worry that someone is secretly miffed at me for not answering something, but I view it was a slightly transitory thing and if I don't have time to answer, I just don't. *shrug* and I try not to take every little thing too seriously, and hope others feel the same way.
Some people get... I dunno, more from me. People I've known longer, people who are closer to me.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-10 07:42 am (UTC)personX: post post post blah blah blah
personY: yes! right on! semi-related point Q...
Is person X obligated to respond, particularly in the absence of point Q (i.e. the comment is basically, "yay! indeed!")? If person X feels inspired to respond (regardless of obligation) to point Q, is person Y then expected to respond back with a "right on!" or is it bad form to clutter person X's journal with relatively meaningless, if supportive, commentary?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-10 08:48 am (UTC)Erm... so if I were person X, and I posted the respones to point Q, I would neither be worried that another answer would clutter my journal, nor would I be upset that person Y didn't respond if they didn't. It would have to take a pretty passionate dialogue for me to demand another answer.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-10 10:10 am (UTC)I just want there to be some sort of unwritten rules that dictate when a conversation is officially played out. Like is this one? Is this conversation over? Am I just talking because you talked? Am I just navel-gazing at this point? ARGH. :D
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-10 10:15 am (UTC)Now, let's see if you answer THIS one!! haha! I'm so mean.
Sometimes I will specificallly say, "there is no need to answer this".
Another one that gets me:
LJ User X: post, i'm engaged, or someother life change that seems to demand acknowledgement.
LJ User A-Q: yay! congrats! etc!
Does LJ User X need to respond to each one? I say no. But does someone else feel a different way?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-05-10 10:19 am (UTC)So, my unstated rule is basically, I will reply to any comment that strikes me in some way, but not to every comment ever. Also, I will never be offended by people not responding to my comments or posts, as I'm used to people reading my blog and never saying a word.