women and feelings and stuff...
Mar. 1st, 2005 05:01 pmHave you all read Odd Girl Out? Because you should. It describes really well my own personal experience of girl culture, which I assume is pretty normal. And in a weird way, it also describes a lot of the issues with groups of women.
I am and generally have been the sort of person who will tell people what I think without much hesitation. I figure you'll either like me for that or not, but sooner or later it'd come out anyhow, you know? But I find myself shifting into a freakish middle school sensibility right out of Odd Girl Out in the company of the Mus [for those not playing the home game, that's my new nickname for the dance troupe]. Being introduced bit by bit to the political roles and behind the scenes machinations (a great word, that) and establishing new friendships with people who aren't all part of the same small circles somehow shifted me into thinking like I needed to prove myself and make people like me and they're all looking at me all the time and I need to be nice and make everyone happy.
This middle-school thought pattern, she is really self-absorbed. Like anyone else has time to be looking at and evaluating me constantly. Puh-lease.
It seems that the political intrigue is common to a lot of other dance companies and dance scenes, too. What do all of them have in common? They're mostly women. And I think it's natural for humans to want to jockey for position and test each other a little, especially when change and new people come, but it's still not considered acceptable for women to do that outright, not even jokingly. So we sublimate our curiosity and chest-beating and act nice. You can live off that grid in many ways, but if you run into a bunch of people who seem to live on it, what do you do? You can avoid them, you can pretend it's not there, or you can try to be nice. I think I'm going to go for "pretend it's not there" (behaviourally at least), as I will otherwise run screaming from a room at some near-future point. And then everyone will be looking at me.
I'm curious, though - what have you seen work in your own grrrl or boi groups? What makes people feel comfortable being themselves when they have a very limited common interest?
I am and generally have been the sort of person who will tell people what I think without much hesitation. I figure you'll either like me for that or not, but sooner or later it'd come out anyhow, you know? But I find myself shifting into a freakish middle school sensibility right out of Odd Girl Out in the company of the Mus [for those not playing the home game, that's my new nickname for the dance troupe]. Being introduced bit by bit to the political roles and behind the scenes machinations (a great word, that) and establishing new friendships with people who aren't all part of the same small circles somehow shifted me into thinking like I needed to prove myself and make people like me and they're all looking at me all the time and I need to be nice and make everyone happy.
This middle-school thought pattern, she is really self-absorbed. Like anyone else has time to be looking at and evaluating me constantly. Puh-lease.
It seems that the political intrigue is common to a lot of other dance companies and dance scenes, too. What do all of them have in common? They're mostly women. And I think it's natural for humans to want to jockey for position and test each other a little, especially when change and new people come, but it's still not considered acceptable for women to do that outright, not even jokingly. So we sublimate our curiosity and chest-beating and act nice. You can live off that grid in many ways, but if you run into a bunch of people who seem to live on it, what do you do? You can avoid them, you can pretend it's not there, or you can try to be nice. I think I'm going to go for "pretend it's not there" (behaviourally at least), as I will otherwise run screaming from a room at some near-future point. And then everyone will be looking at me.
I'm curious, though - what have you seen work in your own grrrl or boi groups? What makes people feel comfortable being themselves when they have a very limited common interest?
Damn, I'm on my way out the door.
Date: 2005-03-01 02:49 pm (UTC)Re: Damn, I'm on my way out the door.
Date: 2005-03-02 07:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-01 03:20 pm (UTC)I don't know if this is exactly relevant to what you're talking about, but there was this pressure to fit in and be nice about everything (where nice=total agreement), and your entry just brought it to mind.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-01 08:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-01 03:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-01 09:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-01 03:59 pm (UTC)Have you read A Sense of Self: Listening to Home Schooled Girls by Susannah Sheffer? The girls in that book don't seem to play all those games. Not because they're above it- but because they just don't get it. For the most part, it wasn't their culture.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-01 08:47 pm (UTC)I haven't read the one you mentioned. I'll have to check it out.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-02 09:32 am (UTC)I just don't get why there aren't more studies looking at school itself that point out, "Good God! Look what schools do to kids. Let's examine how schools socialize our children and what can we do to change the schools" instead of treating the school experience as a given and trying to help kids despite the social organization of school. I don't mean schools should be abolished, but that the way most of them are organized is crazy making and addressing that is preferable to doing damage control with our children. There's always talk about education reform, but schools seem pretty much the same now as they did when I was a kid. They were sit down, shut-up and learn these things. Except for one school. It was far less structured- or maybe just structured differently. There wasn't as much sitting down and shutting-up. Lots of discussion and student input. Also less emphasis on competition (no tracking, kids working at their own pace). I learned a lot there, and I think that was partly because I was relaxed in school. There wasn't a lot of bullying or clique stuff going on. It existed, but nothing like it was in the traditional public schools I attended. Mostly, I think, because when kids are encouraged to participate more fully in their own education and feel their opinion is valued, and when they aren't all sorted and labeled, they don't have as much need to bully and exclude ( which are cruder way of sorting and labeling).
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-02 12:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-01 04:34 pm (UTC)However, I hate to break it to you, but I am absolutely looking at you and evaluating you every time you walk into a Mu gathering. Is she good enough? Is she nice enough? Did she bring me presents? I wonder if she'll sleep with me ...
*grin* If it makes you feel any better, I'm the only one in the Mus who gets off on political machinations. I keep telling Cricket and Our Brave and Fearless Leader -- "Goddammit, work everything out behind the scenes! Line up your support before you call for a vote! Don't you know anything about politics??" But noooooo -- they think we should be an open democracy! Sheesh!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-01 08:43 pm (UTC)Anyhow, my dick's way bigger than yours. ;P
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-01 08:48 pm (UTC)okay now i'm definitely going to try to get you in bed. and i'll show you mine if you show me yours ;)
PS
Date: 2005-03-01 04:36 pm (UTC)Re: PS
Date: 2005-03-01 08:59 pm (UTC)Although I suspect that if the things I'm thinking actually started popping out of my mouth (many of which would SOUND rude, even if they weren't), YOU'd still think I was swell, but not everyone else.
Re: PS
Date: 2005-03-01 10:35 pm (UTC)Re: PS
Date: 2005-03-02 06:05 am (UTC)Re: PS
Date: 2005-03-02 07:51 am (UTC)related to work. irony
Date: 2005-03-03 08:19 am (UTC)Re: related to work. irony
Date: 2005-03-03 10:58 am (UTC)Re: related to work. irony
Date: 2005-03-03 11:01 am (UTC)Re: related to work. irony
Date: 2005-03-03 12:07 pm (UTC)