keryx: (polkadot)
[personal profile] keryx
A bunch of things recently have made me think about division of labor in (generally speaking romantic) partnerships - be it who picks up the check or who does most of the childrearing or who does the laundry - or whatever.

So I'm curious how the rest of you see this stuff. Indulge me?

[Poll #365253]

[Er, apologies for my apparent issues with spelling "individual", by the way.]

Other, explained in comments...

Date: 2004-10-12 03:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peregrin8.livejournal.com
"How important is division of responsibilities to a partnership?"

I think it's very important when it's not going well! In my relationship, it's going quite smoothly so we hardly ever have to work at it, but I get the impression that this is rare.

good point...

Date: 2004-10-12 06:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keryx.livejournal.com
and I get the impression that lots of households struggle with this, or one partner (the woman in a straight couple most often) feels taken advantage of. I think it's telling that my LJ friends seem to feel like this works out okay in their relationships - almost all of y'all are feminists.

Re: good point...

Date: 2004-10-12 06:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peregrin8.livejournal.com
I have a good situation (for me) in that we both work regular 40-hour jobs, have separate finances, and no kids. All the women I know IRL who struggle with this are moms. (In situations ranging from stay-at-home mom to both-parents-work to stay-at-home-dad.)

Re: good point...

Date: 2004-10-13 01:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keryx.livejournal.com
So, do you think it's having kids that starts making the workload balance an issue? That would jive with popular "feminist" thought these days. Not having kids or knowing many people before and after they had kids, I couldn't say anything from experience.

Re: good point...

Date: 2004-10-13 01:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peregrin8.livejournal.com
Well, it definitely makes the home-front workload a LOT bigger. I mean, my sweetie and I can pretty much ignore the chores if we want... other than taking care of the cat. And it's his cat. :-)

Re: good point...

Date: 2004-10-12 07:35 pm (UTC)
libskrat: (Default)
From: [personal profile] libskrat
Eh, well. I definitely have my moments of non-working-out-ness. Curiously, it's not the division of manual labor that grates my nerves (when I'm in a space where this does grate my nerves, which is far from always); it's the division of mental labor. The "keeping track of stuff" work.
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-12 03:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keryx.livejournal.com
I also had a difficult time differentiating between "equal" and "unequal based on abilities."

I have a tough time making that differentiation, too. I think it's all about the perceptions of the individuals involved (and therefore probably more of a sign of the health of the relationship than anything else). We're kinda like you with the cooking and washing up, but with money and housework. It's inequal if you look at one sphere, but equal if you look at the sum total.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-12 03:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snidegrrl.livejournal.com
I said "in an ideal world" the division would be "completely equal" because in an ideal world, we can both do everything and we both enjoy it all. :)

Also, I would echo what [livejournal.com profile] peregrin8 said: It's very important, but we don't work that hard on it, usually it's easy to come to a decision. If talking about it is considered hard, then I guess it's hard work?

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-12 04:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peregrin8.livejournal.com
Oh... in an ideal world I think our robot maid does all the housework and then brings me a martini!

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-12 04:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keryx.livejournal.com
Hmm. Are there class issues with robot maids, though?

Maybe they could be issued like social security cards. Yeah. In an ideal world we all have equal robot maids who do our housework and bring us martinis or water and none of us are alcoholics ever despite the constant martini consumption because the world is ideal.

Oy. I really need to never use the phrase "ideal world" again. ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-12 05:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keryx.livejournal.com
aw, i didn't mean to induce sniffing. :(

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-12 05:56 pm (UTC)
firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
From: [personal profile] firecat
In my partnership division of responsibilities has worked (and not worked) all sorts of different ways. We divide up many tasks according to who's better at them / who prefers doing them, but we do other tasks equally. Sometimes when one of us has health issues, the other takes on more of the work than usual. It also depends on whether and where and how much one or both of us is working for pay. The OH recently got an office job; I have an almost full-time freelance job, but I have more free time during the day so I've been doing more cooking lately (for most of our relationship, though, he has done way more cooking than I have).

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-14 06:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ide-cyan.livejournal.com
In my ideal world...

The basic component of society would not be the co-dependent pair-unit partnership of holy coupledom.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-14 01:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] keryx.livejournal.com
Nor was I suggesting it was now (although there are certainly societal messages to that effect). Thus use of partner(s).

September 2020

S M T W T F S
  12345
678 9101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags